Sunday, November 30, 2008

Auto workers chief asks for U.S. aid

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The head of the United Auto Workers made a public plea Sunday for government help for U.S. carmakers as the Big Three put the final touches on stabilization plans to submit to Congress.

"We cannot afford to see these companies fail," said Ron Gettelfinger, the UAW chief, calling on Congress to approve the aid during a special session the week of Dec. 8.

Gettelfinger said a $25 billion rescue plan for the carmakers is "not a bailout, this is a loan - a bridge loan - that will get us through until we can take a longer-term look at exactly what needs to be done in the industry."

Democratic leaders are demanding blueprints from Chrysler LLC, Ford Motor Co. (F, Fortune 500) and General Motors Corp. (GM, Fortune 500) before they will schedule votes on any new federal aid. The plans, due Tuesday, are to be scrutinized at a Senate hearing Wednesday and a House hearing on Friday.

If lawmakers like what they see, Congress may reconvene the following week to consider the auto bailout.

Members of Congress remain deeply divided on the aid, with many in both parties wary of supporting another costly government rescue on the heels of the $700 billion Wall Street bailout.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said he would not back the help for the U.S. auto industry.

"I don't believe it is a good idea to take $25 billion and give it to the three major car companies, which I think have a business plan that's doomed to fail," he said.

Like many Republicans and some Democrats, Graham said it would be better to allow one or more of the struggling companies to go under and restructure in bankruptcy.

Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., said she's willing to consider an auto bailout, but not before Congress gets a clear accounting of the companies' financial situation.

"We need to behave like a bank," McCaskill said. "And we need to make sure that we get all of those internal financials and that we feel comfortable that this is a good investment for the American taxpayer."

The Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee is scheduled to meet Wednesday on the automakers' plans. The House Financial Services Committee has set a Friday session.

"They have to show a plan that shows that the $25 billion gets them to the point of viability. They have to show us a plan of how they're going to restructure their industry. They have to show us a plan about not opposing higher fuel efficiency (standards). If they do those things, there will be support for them," said Sen. Robert Menendez, D-N.J., a member of the Senate committee.

The UAW is willing to consider more concessions on wages and benefits as part of any new federal aid, Gettelfinger said, but other parties have to share in the sacrifice.

"We're prepared to go back to the table," Gettelfinger said. Still, he added, "Based on the changes we've made to our contracts, we are competitive" already.

In return for new federal loans, leading Democrats want the Big Three to agree to eliminate lavish executive pay packages and dividends; reimburse taxpayers; share future profits with the government; and show how they will meet fuel-efficiency standards and cover their health care and pension obligations to workers.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., have ordered Chrysler, Ford and GM executives to address all those issues in the plans they submit to Congress.

Gettelfinger and Menendez spoke on CNN's "Late Edition." Graham and McCaskill were on "Fox News Sunday." 


Big Three must sell case to Congress
Bipartisan bailout push

Gas prices: Lowest since 2005

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Gas prices fell to their lowest level since 2005, coming within 4 cents of $1.80 a gallon, according to a daily survey of gas station credit card swipes by motorist group AAA.

Gas prices slipped 1.1 cents to a national average of $1.835 a gallon, according to Friday's survey.

Prices have fallen by more than 55% since hitting a record high of $4.114 a gallon in mid-July as the price of crude oil, gasoline's main ingredient, has plummeted.

Concern about falling fuel consumption in the midst of the current economic crisis has propelled oil prices down more than 60% since July.

Typically, energy expenditures are the first to be trimmed back during periods of economic sluggishness as business activity declines and consumers try to save money by driving less, say economists.

Gasoline prices are now below $2 a gallon, on average, in 43 states. Missouri had the lowest prices at $1.546 a gallon. Alaska continues to have the highest prices at an average of $2.817 a gallon.

Diesel: The price of diesel fuel, which is used by most trucks and commercial vehicles, fell 1.2 cents to a national average of $2.775 a gallon, according to AAA.

Diesel prices have fallen more than 40% since hitting a high of $4.845 in July.

Ethanol: Meanwhile the price of E85, an 85% ethanol blend made primarily corn, has also fallen 1.2 cents to $1.617 a gallon on average, according to AAA.

E85 can be used as a gas substitute in special configured "flex-fuel" vehicles. However, it is difficult to find outside of the corn-producing Midwest region, and it is not sold at the pump in some states.

The AAA figures, compiled by Oil Price Information Services, are state-wide averages based on credit card swipes at up to 100,000 service stations across the nation. Individual drivers may see lower fuel prices in different areas of each state. 


Lower gas prices won’t lower food prices just yet
Below-$3 gas is welcome in Nashville
Gas prices continue to fall

Cheap is the new black for retail

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Americans may be descending on the malls today to hunt for bargains. But this is still expected to be a blue Christmas for many retailers and a gloomy end to what's turning out to be a dismal 2008.

Nonetheless, some consumer stocks are actually thriving this year. Not surprisingly, almost all of the retailers that are in the black through Black Friday are benefiting from the weak economy because they tend to focus on thrifty shoppers. (And who isn't trying to be more frugal these days?)

Shares of Wal-Mart Stores (WMT, Fortune 500) have gained nearly 20% so far this year. That makes it not just the best-performing stock in the Dow in 2008 -- it's the only one of the Dow 30 that's up this year.

The discount retailer is expected to post an 8% gain in sales and 10% increase in profits -- incredibly impressive in this economic environment.

Big Lots (BIG, Fortune 500), a closeout retailer of bargain-priced merchandise, is also doing well as consumers pull back. The stock is up 10% this year and earnings per share are expected to increase 35%.

Talkback: Are you shopping more at discount retailers because of the weak economy?

But the companies that are really taking off this year are the ones that offer consumers the most bang for their buck -- literally. Shares of the dollar store discount chains have been among the best-performers in the market in 2008.

Dollar Tree (DLTR) has soared about 60% so far. Shares of Family Dollar Stores (FDO, Fortune 500) are up 50% while 99 Cents Only Stores (NDN) has gained more than 35%.

Are these stocks still worth buying though? That's less certain.

On the one hand, many are predicting that the economic malaise will linger into the early part of 2009. That means these companies are likely to rack up sales and profits increases that will outpace the rest of the retail industry.

Wal-Mart, for example, is expected to report an earnings per share increase of 8% in its next fiscal year. Analysts are forecasting a 10% jump in profits for Dollar Tree next year.

But investors are already anticipating this sluggishness to continue and have priced that into the stocks of many of these discounters. So several now actually trade at luxury-like valuations when compared to other retailers.

Wal-Mart, Family Dollar and Dollar Tree all trade at more than 16 times earnings estimates for this fiscal year, compared to an average price-to-earnings ratio of just below 13 for the retailing sector.

In addition, it's important to remember that investors often do a pretty good job of predicting economic recoveries well before they happen. Even though the next few quarters look bleak, there are growing hopes that the worst of this downturn will be over by late 2009.

If that's the case, money may start to move out of hot stocks like these discount retailers and back into other more hard-hit consumer stocks, as well as beaten down banks and tech companies, which could all do well once the economy improves.

So buyer beware. Cheap may be chic now. But the discount retailers are so in vogue on Wall Street that these stocks are no longer the "doorbuster" deals they used to be. 


Wal-Mart’s profits rise as it draws from rivals
Retailers’ holiday deals begin early
Retail sales suffer another huge blow
Blame the yen for Wii, LCD prices

279,000 stimulus checks unclaimed

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Never got that stimulus check in the mail? It might be as simple as a wrong address, and the IRS deadline to fix the error is today.

The Internal Revenue Service is trying to find 279,000 recipients for more than $163 million in undelivered economic stimulus payments, according to the government. The average undelivered check is worth about $583.

Most undelivered stimulus payments had incorrect or incomplete addresses, according to the IRS. By law, the agency can't send out any more economic stimulus checks after Dec. 31 of this year.

However, "if you don't by chance make the deadline, and get your economic stimulus check in time, you can get it as a credit [a recovery rebate credit] on your 2008 tax return," said an IRS spokesman.

The IRS is also looking for the recipients of more than 104,000 regular tax refund checks worth about $103 million that were returned by the U.S. Postal Service due to mailing address errors.

"People across the country are missing tax refunds and stimulus checks. We want to get this money into the hands of taxpayers where it belongs," said IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman in a statement in October.

You can check the status of your stimulus check and get instructions on how to update addresses at http://www.irs.gov/ by clicking on the Where's My Stimulus Payment? tool. Taxpayers without Internet access can call 1-866-234-2942.

CNNMoney.com staff writer Kenneth Musante contributed to this report. 


Regional banks to sell maximum stock amount
Bush ‘open’ to stimulus
Pinnacle applies for federal money
7.5 million homeowners ‘underwater’

Cold shoppers seek hot toy deals

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- The hot pursuit of discounted toys and video games kept lots of shoppers waiting in the cold, dark night on Black Friday.

Deals on a Playstation 2 combo, a $50 gift card to go with a black 16-gigabyte iPod nano, a half-priced talking Dora the Explorer and the newest Elmo doll were motivation enough to have excited shoppers bursting through the front door of Toys R Us in the heart of New York City.

The line outside of the flagship toy store in Times Square started forming at 9 p.m. ET Thursday night, eight hours before the store's doors opened at 5 a.m. Friday.

Ryan Bailey, 20, from New York City, was the first shopper in line at 9 p.m. Thursday night. She arrived at 1 a.m. last year for the doorbuster sale and the line was already very long.

After checking the sales online, Bailey had a shopping list included a Nintendo Wii, an Elmo doll and a pretend kitchen.

Preston Livingston, 44, from Bronx, N.Y., was the second in line. He arrived at 9:05 p.m., just after Bailey. Livingston said the reason he got in line so early was, "I want to get a good bargain, and I hope they don't run out."

In an effort to lure in shoppers, Toys R Us offered 150 doorbuster sales - 100 in a printed circular and an additional 50 which were announced online, said Toys R Us spokesman Bob Friedland.

The ads seemed to work. The line to get into the store was down the street and around the block by the time the doors opened.

Before 5:30 a.m., there was already a line wrapping around the downstairs video game section as customers waited to pay for their video games and gaming accessories.

Other popular items included the new Elmo Live, and the life-sized Dora doll, which was offered at 50% off at $59.99.

Most shoppers - regardless of what item they were looking to purchase - emphasized the fact that in the current economy, getting a good deal on presents for the family was essential.

"I am looking for more sales," said Ramona Duclerc, 30, of Bronx, N.Y., "I am not trying to buy less, just spend less. Kids don't understand about money or a lack thereof."

Duclerc said she knew about the bargains the toy store was offering because of ads in the newspaper and past experience.

Another doorbuster shopper said that the weak economy was going to mean fewer presents for her kids.

"I am not going to buy as much as I did last year," said Nikia Hall, 27, of Staten Island, N.Y. "They will still have a good Christmas, but they are going to notice."

Another shopper, however, said that the economic downturn was not hurting his holiday spending. The weak economy "did not affect anything," said Troy Williams, 26, of Manhattan. "I have been saving and doing things like that so it did not really affect me."

One shopper who attends the Toys R Us doorbuster sale every year said that the Black Friday discounts were a disappointment this year.

"The prices could have been a little better. They could have had more things 50% off instead of buy two, get one free," said Karey Glover, 25, of New York City.

The economic slowdown has Marlene Washington, 45, of Staten Island, N.Y., thinking more about paying down her debt and using coupons.

"I think everyone is being frugal. I am surprised to see some of the big-ticket items actually being bought," Washington said. 


Black Friday may have been a bust
Black Friday turns tragic for Wal-Mart

Fed loans to banks increase in latest week

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Federal Reserve boosted its lending to commercial banks and investment firms over the past week, indicating that a severe credit crisis was still squeezing the financial system.

The Fed released a report Friday saying commercial banks averaged $93.6 billion in daily borrowing for the week ending Wednesday. That was up from an average of $91.6 billion for the week ending Nov. 19.

The report also said investment firms borrowed an average of $52.4 billion from the Fed's emergency loan program over the week ending Wednesday, up from an average of $50.2 billion the previous week.

The Fed said its net holdings of business loans known as commercial paper over the week ended Wednesday averaged $282.2 billion, an increase of $16.5 billion from the previous week.

Financial firms are borrowing from the Fed because they are having trouble raising money through normal channels as the financial system endures its worst crisis since the Great Depression.

Banks are hoarding cash rather than making loans out of fear that they won't be repaid. The Fed and the Treasury have been flooding the financial system with money in hopes that banks can return lending operations to more normal levels.

The central bank on Oct. 27 began buying commercial paper, the short-term debt that companies use to pay everyday expenses. It was one of a series of moves the Fed has made to try to unfreeze credit markets.

The Fed's goal is to raise demand in this area as a way to boost the availability of commercial paper, which has been seriously constrained since the financial crisis hit with force in September.

The report said insurance giant American International Group (AIG, Fortune 500)'s loan from the Fed averaged $79.6 billion for the week ended Wednesday. That was down by $5.6 billion from the average the previous week.

The reduction reflected a modification of the government's support program for AIG earlier this month. Under that change, Treasury stepped in with a $40 billion purchase of stock in AIG, using money from the government's $700 billion financial system rescue package. The increased support from Treasury allowed the Fed to reduce slightly the size of its total loans to AIG.

The Fed unveiled two new programs Tuesday in a further effort to get consumer credit flowing again.

It said it would begin buying mortgage-backed securities from mortgage giants such as Fannie Mae (FNM, Fortune 500) and Freddie Mac. (FRE, Fortune 500) And it announced a program to lend to financial firms that buy securities backed by various types of consumer debt, from credit cards to auto and student loans. 


Fed bets $800 billion on consumers
Q&A: Interest rate cuts won’t have immediate impact
Obama to inherit red ink
Banks borrow record $112B from Fed

Saturday, November 29, 2008

World stocks mixed, India market climbs

LONDON (AP) -- European and U.S. stock markets were mixed Friday despite strong Asian gains earlier, though trading volumes were thin as Wall Street traders returned from the Thanksgiving holiday for a shortened work day before the weekend.

The FTSE 100 index of leading British shares was up 20.57 points, or 0.5%, at 4,246.67, while Germany's DAX was 17.15 points, or 0.4%, lower at 4,648.12. The CAC-40 in France was 12.75 points, or 0.4%, lower at 3,237.64.

Meanwhile, the Dow Jones industrial average was 15.30 points, or 0.2%, higher at 8,741.91 in thin post-holiday trading, but the broader Standard & Poor's 500 index was 3.22 points, or 0.4%, lower at 884.46.

With Wall Street closing three hours early at 1 p.m EST and many traders taking an extra day off work, volumes have been light.

What U.S. traders were around were focusing on the prospects for the holiday shopping period, which began in earnest earlier. Wall Street expects a weak showing by retailers as consumers, nervous about lost jobs, falling home values and a jittery stock market, grow more restrained in their spending this year.

A rare decline in year-on-year holiday spending would be troubling as it is the most important part of the calendar for most retailers and because consumer purchases account for more than two-thirds of U.S. economic activity. But much of the evidence arriving Friday from retailers is likely to be anecdotal as it will be too early to tally cash register receipts or gain much insight into shoppers' behavior.

Both the U.S. and Europe have enjoyed one of their best weeks in months as some appetite for risk-taking was renewed by the U.S. government's rescue of Citigroup Inc (C, Fortune 500)., economic stimulus plans around the world and further measures from the Federal Reserve to boost bank lending.

Though the downbeat economic environment is expected to play havoc with earnings over the coming months, many investors are slowing returning to buying up beaten-down stocks.

"Valuations are cheap, so cheap as to preclude us from being wholesale sellers at prevailing levels," said Jeremy Batstone-Carr, head of research at Charles Stanley.

"We accept that a sustainable recovery is unlikely until the earnings newsflow improves but much of the bad news is now 'in the price'," he said.

In Asia earlier, the attacks in Mumbai and the shutdown of Bangkok's airports by anti-government protestors did little to dampen improving investor sentiment.

Instead, investors were hopeful that a raft of policy measures around the world, such as Washington's rescue of Citigroup and China's rate cut and multi-billion dollar stimulus plan, would limit the scale of the global downturn next year.

"The market is reacting very calmly to the terrorist attack," said Francis Lun, general manager of Fulbright Securities Ltd. in Hong Kong. "Investors in Hong Kong are still fixated on China's huge reduction in interest rates. There's bargain-hunting across the board."

India's stock market gained Friday, a day after trading was suspended due to deadly terrorist attacks in the country's financial capital.

The Sensex Index climbed 66 points, or 0.7%, to close at 9,092.72. The benchmark opened down more than 1% and then fluctuated in and out of positive territory before finishing higher.

Trading on the Bombay Stock Exchange was closed Thursday after suspected Muslim militants staged coordinated attacks across Mumbai, India's financial capital, killing at least 143 people. The exchange is located in Mumbai.

Hong Kong's Hang Seng index rose 336.18 points, or 2.5%, to 13,888.24 - a gain of 9.7% for the week. Japan's Nikkei 225 index climbed 1.7% to 8,512.27 - an advance of 7.6% for the week.

Australia's benchmark S&P/ASX200 index surged 4.3%, while South Korea's benchmark rose 1.2%.

Thai stocks also rose amid speculation that the intensifying political unrest could be resolved over the weekend. Protesters wanting to unseat the prime minister have taken over Bangkok's two main airports, disrupting travel and shipments around the region. The main SET index jumped 3.1% to 401.84.

The only major Asian market to decline was mainland China, where the Shanghai Composite index fell 2.4%. But the index rose 8.2% for the month of November, its biggest one-month gain in 15 months, driven by optimism about the government's stimulus package.

Oil prices fell below $54 a barrel as investors eyed a possible production cut by OPEC this weekend amid a gloomy global demand outlook. Light, sweet crude for January delivery was down $0.87 to $53.57 a barrel in electronic trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange.

In currencies, the dollar rose 0.1% to 95.45 yen, while the euro fell 1.2% to $1.2741 after a sharper than anticipated decline in inflation and a rise in joblessness in the 15-nation euro-zone. 


Markets are battered again
Dollar mixed against rivals

Foreign shoppers turn out for Black Friday

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- At 7:30 Black Friday morning, 34th Street in Manhattan was already teeming with shoppers; nearly everyone on the street was carrying at least one bulging bag. And a good number of the bargain hunters were from other countries.

With the dollar weakening against many currencies during the middle years of the decade, international travelers came to the United States for big bargains. And now, as consumer spending here cools, income from these foreign sources this holiday season could be crucial for many retailers.

But with the dollar growing stronger against many major currencies, most stores better not count on a getting as big a boost from foreigners this year, according to Ellen Davis, a spokeswoman for the National Retail Federation.

"Previously, because of the exchange rates, we saw tremendous holiday shopping seasons," she said. "This year with the weakening global economy, we're seeing retailers all over the world struggling. Consumers are pulling back."

Record numbers of visitors

International travel to the United States had been holding up quite well this year with 34.9 million visitors by the end of August, a 9% jump compared with the same period a year ago. They spent $96.3 billion, up 24%, according to the Commerce Department.

Since then, however, economies have slowed from Iceland to China as the U.S. currency gained ground. British pounds, for example, have lost 40% of their value against the dollar compared with last year at this time.

Linda McMeiken, visiting New York from Surrey, England, was disappointed about the dollar-pound exchange rate, which had turned considerably against her since her last trip to the states in early 2008. "It was two dollars to a pound then," she said. "Now it's 1.4. This trip, I don't think the prices are too good."

Earlier this week, she checked out a menu at Ben and Jack's, a steakhouse in midtown Manhattan, and judged it "just as expensive as London."

Northern and southern exposure

Many Canadians also have seen their currency edge erode as their dollar fell 23% against the greenback since last November. Mexican pesos are also down about the same amount. Most major Latin American currencies have declined as has the Russian ruble.

Euro-based visitors are faring a little better than most but it's still off this year. The dollar is trading for about 0.77 euros, up from 0.67 a year ago. That means goods bought now are about 15% more expensive than last Black Friday. Despite that, many euro-travelers believe prices are still cheap enough here to substantially offset the cost of airfare, hotels and restaurants.

Some of the more bullish visitors at Macy's Black Friday sale morning were from Ireland. Several expressed satisfaction with bargains they were finding.

Lorrain Downey of Dublin, who was in Macy's mostly to buy clothing and gifts, said, "There's a big difference in prices." Louise Cahill of Tipperary called New York prices "very cheap.

Coleman Moore and his family found prices so good they were planning to shop most of Friday and Saturday as well. He said prices were not only terrific, but as a bank employee in Dublin, he had gotten a very good exchange rate as well - about 1.31 dollars per euro rather than about 1.25. With two kids to buy clothing and accessories for, that helps.

"We have a very expensive 20-year-old," he said, "and a very expensive 16-year-old as well."

A Scottish couple, Margaret and Peter Hahn, thought they were still doing quite well shopping in the States even though the pound had dropped so much. She said, "Prices are still a lot lower than at home. We're going to buy clothes and watches, and we have five grandsons. We'll get gifts for all of them."

Up from Down Under

For Rob Halpern and his family, who arrived earlier in the week from Sydney, Australia, one of the main purposes of the trip was shopping.

"Nearly everything is imported to Australia," said Halpern, who owns a sports memorabilia business, "and the prices here are a lot sharper. We're buying name-brands like Levis and Nike."

The family hit Macy's flagship store at 34th St. before 8:00 to try to beat the worst of the throngs of shoppers. "We were here for Christmas before, and it was too busy," said Halpern, shivering at the memory. He still likes American prices even though the Australian dollar has lost more than 35% of its value against the dollar since last Black Friday.

One thing that can make shopping worthwhile, even as exchange rates get less favorable, is the no-holds-barred sales that many stores run on Black Friday.

A young Israeli woman, who only gave her first name of Orit, was in Macy's early Friday after spending the night on line at a nearby Best Buy. She had lined up there at 10 p.m. to buy a bargain notebook computer.

"Finally, at four o'clock they gave me a ticket and I was able to buy it at five," she said.

Before that, she had been finding that New York prices not much different from her home country but there's nothing in Tel Aviv like the door-buster, Black Friday special of $379.99 for a laptop. 


Retailers’ holiday deals begin early
Black Friday retailers hopeful
$10M retail expansion cleared for Mt. Juliet

Black Friday turns tragic for Wal-Mart

ALEXANDRIA, Va. (CNNMoney.com) -- Wal-Mart - expected to benefit this holiday season from its deep discounting in a tough economy - had its Black Friday marred when an employee was trampled to death as thousands of people rushed through the doors at the opening of the store in Valley Stream, N.Y.

Police said the man, identified as 34-year-old Jdimytai Damour, was a temporary employee who lived in New York City's borough of Queens.

In addition, police officials said a pregnant woman was taken to a local hospital, but was expected to be released Friday.

Video footage showed as many as a dozen people knocked to the floor in the stampede of people trying to get into the Wal-Mart store, according to Nassau County Police detective Lt. Michael Fleming. The employee was "stepped on by hundreds of people" as other workers attempted to fight their way through the crowd, Fleming said.

"We expected a large crowd this morning and added additional internal security, additional third party security, additional store associates and we worked closely with the Nassau County Police," said Hank Mullany, Wal-Mart's vice president for the Northeast, in a statement. "Despite all of our precautions, this unfortunate event occurred."

"Our thoughts and prayers go out to the families of those impacted," he added, saying the company is cooperating with authorities in their investigation. (Full story)

Around the nation, shoppers descended upon Wal-Mart (WMT, Fortune 500) en masse in hopes of scoring Black Friday discounts. From New Jersey to Dallas, there were reports of hundreds of shoppers lining up before stores opened, looking for $2 DVDs and flat-panel TVs priced just under $400.

At the Fairfax, Va., location, the scene was social. Hundreds queued up before doors opened at 5 a.m., with some having arrived the night before in order to be among the first to shop.

"We skipped Thanksgiving dinner," said 30-year-old Arash Habiezadeh.

Wal-Mart, which operates more than 4,100 U.S. stores and 3,100 international locations, is expected to be a big winner this holiday season as its discounts resonate with budget-conscious shoppers. The company has been aggressively courting customers by lowering its prices and introducing holiday-gift sections in stores.

"Even with the economy, you've got to go with the deals," said Robert Balboni of Centreville, Va., while loading his shopping cart with a 42-inch flat panel TV, a portable DVD player and a Philips 2GB MP3 player.

Wal-Mart has already shown signs of benefiting from the economic slowdown. Same-store sales, or sales at retail stores open at least a year, gained 2.4% in October, beating the company's own forecast.

Overall, the U.S. retail sector is expected to endure one of its worst holiday seasons in years. Sales are projected to climb just 2.2%, according to the National Retail Federation, making it the weakest sales gain in six years.

-- The Associated Press, CNN's Christina Cinnici and CNNMoney.com senior writer Parija B. Kavilanz contributed to this story. 


Retail sales suffer another huge blow
Wal-Mart’s profits rise as it draws from rivals
Retailers’ holiday deals begin early
Holiday job picture not so jolly

Thursday, November 27, 2008

Bailouts: $7 trillion and rising

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- The U.S. government is now willing to spend more than $7 trillion to help rescue the economy. That's about $23,000 for every American, and more than half of U.S. annual gross domestic product.

It's a staggering and unprecedented amount of money. The last time the government went on a spending spree to cure a crisis was in the late 1980s and 1990s during the savings and loan crisis. But the $160 billion ($237 billion in today's dollars) it spent then comes nowhere close to what's being spent now.

But it may not be as bad as it seems: A substantial portion of that $7 trillion is investment, the government hasn't spent close to the total allotment yet, and the taxpayer may come out on top in the end.

"It's a lot of money, but it's not like it's out the door, never to be seen again," said Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research. "A lot will be lost, but we're not going to lose anywhere close to $7 trillion."

The government has invested about $3 trillion of the total allotment, and it has already received much of that investment back. For instance, the Fed has gotten back about $1.2 trillion of the $1.6 trillion it has lent banks in its ongoing Term Auction Facility.

The government collects interest on its loans and when it takes an equity stake in a company or takes hold of an asset-backed security, those holdings could mature in value over the duration of the government's possession of them.

"At the end of the day, it's an expensive plan, but the government had to step in," said John Silvia, chief economist at Wachovia. "It's a difficult thing to estimate, but the government could sell the assets at a decent price once the market's better."

Furthermore, some of the $7 trillion will likely never be spent. The government can spend up to $1.4 trillion in purchases of short-term business debt under the Fed's Commercial Paper Funding Facility, but so far it has spent just $270 billion on the program.

Pessimists say the government is spending too much, putting taxpayer dollars at risk. Some say, that for all the government has spent, the results don't match the actions.

But optimists argue that much of the bailout serves as a guardrail, preventing the financial system from falling into a total collapse. And most economists argue that the cost of not acting would be far greater.

"We're doing this to prevent a financial collapse," said Baker. "Not acting would be much worse, because the financial system would grind to a halt."

More bailout measures still may be coming, as economists say the serious problems facing financial institutions have not yet subsided.

"More banks will likely fail, and I wouldn't be surprised if the FDIC has to go to Congress to get recapitalized," said Baker. "There's lots more bad debt that has yet to show up."

There's also a growing chorus of voices outside of Treasury to spread bailout money around.

The recent struggles of GM (GM, Fortune 500), Ford (F, Fortune 500) and Chrysler have built momentum for a bailout of the U.S. auto industry. Automakers have until Dec. 2 to submit proposals for how they would use - and pay back - $25 billion of government funding. The Bush administration has said it does not want a Detroit bailout to come from TARP funds.

Some government officials like FDIC Chair Sheila Bair have called for TARP money to be used to guarantee mortgages backed by private lenders to encourage them to restructure loans to troubled homeowners.

And President-elect Barack Obama has stated his support for another economic stimulus package in the form of tax rebates to consumers, states and municipalities. Economists believe the bill will cost about $500 billion. The proposal has gained traction in Congress, with hopes that consumer spending and aid to governments will help boost the economy.

Here is how the government has thus far invested billions of dollars to rescue banks, companies, consumers and their homes.

SAVING WALL STREET

The government has taken these steps to aid financial institutions.

Term-auction facility: $1.6 trillion in loans to banks so far in exchange for otherwise unwanted collateral. The Fed increased its monthly auction limit to $300 billion in October, up from $20 billion when the Fed began the program.

Dollar swap lines: Unlimited dollars to 13 foreign central banks to provide liquidity to foreign financial institutions. The Fed lifted its cap after raising it to $620 billion in October from $24 billion in December.

Bear Stearns: $29 billion in a special lending facility to guarantee potential losses on its portfolio. With the lending facility, JPMorgan was able to step in to save Bear from bankruptcy.

Lending to banks: $70 billion lent on average every day to investment banks, after facility opened to non-commercial banks for first time in March. $92 billion a day to commercial banks.

Cash injections: $250 billion allocated to banks from $700 billion rescue package in exchange for equity stake in the financial institutions in the form of senior preferred shares.

Citigroup: $300 billion in troubled asset guarantees and $45 billion in cash-injections to prevent fourth-largest bank from failing.

Fed rate cuts: Down to 1% in October 2008, from 5.25% in September 2007.

SAVING MAIN STREET

Consumers are benefiting from the government's actions in recent months.

Stimulus checks: $100 billion in stimulus checks made their way to 140 million tax filers to boost consumer spending and help grow the economy.

Unemployment benefits: $8 billion toward an expansion of unemployment benefits, to 39 weeks from 26 weeks. Some states must now offer 39-week benefits after an extension act was passed in November.

Bank takeovers: $15.5 billion drawn down so far from the FDIC's deposit insurance fund after 22 bank failures in 2008.

Rehab foreclosed homes: $4 billion to states and municipalities in assistance to buy up and rehabilitate foreclosed properties.

Student loan guarantees: $9 billion so far in government purchases of student loans from private lenders. Higher borrowing costs made student loans unprofitable for a number of lenders, many of whom stopped issuing the loans.

Money-market guarantees: $50 billion in insurance for money-market funds. The Fed then began to lend an unlimited amount of money to finance banks' purchases of debt from money-market funds. The Fed then agreed to purchase up to $69 billion in money-market debt directly. In October, the Fed said it would loan up to $600 billion directly to money-market funds, which was extended for six months in November.

Housing rescue: $300 billion approved for insurance of new 30-year, fixed-rate mortgages for at-risk borrowers. The bill includes $16 billion in tax credits for first-time home buyers. But lenders have been slow to sign on.

Deposit insurance: $250,000 in insurance for interest-bearing accounts, up from $100,000. The FDIC also issued unlimited guarantees on non-interest- bearing accounts and newly issued unsecured bank debt.

Consumer loans: $800 billion extended to consumer loan-backed securities, including $200 billion for assets backed by credit cards and car loans and $500 billion in mortgage-backed securities. The Fed will also buy $100 billion of Fannie Mae and Freddie debt to try to make loans cheaper.

SAVING CORPORATE AMERICA

Uncle Sam has intervened to help companies in the following ways.

Business stimulus: $68 billion in tax breaks to corporations to help loosen the stranglehold on businesses trying to finance daily operating expenses.

Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac: $200 billion to bail out the mortgage finance giants. Federal officials assumed control of the firms and the $5 trillion in home loans they back.

AIG: $152.5 billion restructured bailout, including a direct investment through preferred shares, a easier terms on a $60 billion loan, and new facilities meant to take on the companies exposure to credit-default swaps.

Automakers: $25 billion in low-interest loans to speed the industry's transition to more fuel-efficient vehicles.

Commercial paper facility: $271 billion in corporate debt purchased so far by the Fed since its so-called Commercial Paper Funding Facility opened. The Fed allocated $1.4 trillion for the program. 


Bailout probably will put upward pressure on rates
Lehman’s bond insurers to take a financial bath
Year of the bailout - and now GM?

Biggest durable orders drop in 2 years

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Orders for durable goods declined sharply in October, marking the largest percent decrease in two years, the government reported Wednesday.

Orders in the Commerce Department report fell 6.2% to $193 billion, a much steeper drop than the 2.5% decrease expected by a survey of economists by Briefing.com.

It was the largest decrease since October 2006, when orders fell 8.3% decrease. Orders have now fallen for three straight months because September was revised to a 0.2% decline from a 0.8% increase.

"There's almost nothing positive here," said Sam Bullard, economist at Wachovia. "The weakness was broad-based. That's the consumer pulling back on big-ticket items."

The only increase in new orders was communications equipment, up 7.7%

Nondefense, nonaircraft capital goods - considered an indicator of business spending - decreased 4%, following two consecutive decreases.

That number is "a good proxy for business equipment spending," Bullard said. "With that decreasing over the past 3 months, it points toward significant weakness."

That downward trend should persist over all of next year, Bullard added, predicting it would not recover until the early part of 2010.

New orders on transportation equipment plummeted 11.1%. This shows businesses are pulling back, Bullard said, noting that the recent Boeing strike likely affected domestic orders.

Excluding transportation, new orders decreased 4.4%. Excluding defense, they decreased 4.6%.

Shipments of manufactured durable goods decreased 2.4% to $202.9 billion.

Unfilled orders were down for the first time in 26 months, at a decrease of $4.6 billion, or 0.6%.

Inventories of manufactured durable goods, up 15 of the last 16 months, increased $1.4 billion or 0.4%. This is the highest level since 1992, according to the report.

"Eventually it will turn around, but these numbers are down so low," Bullard said. "At this point, we're not quite at the 2001 recession. But the numbers will get even lower, and they will reflect the more severe contractions of the mid-70s and early 80s recession."

Durable orders measures the dollar volume of orders, shipments and unfilled orders of goods built to last three years or more. The report is viewed as an indicator of manufacturing activity. 


Tennessee’s, nation’s hospices brace for cuts in resources
Factory orders fall more than expected
Wachovia, suitors put lawsuit on hold

Beware the Obama stimulus bubble

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Death and taxes...and overexuberance by investors.

Yes, even in this terrible environment for the markets and economy, traders were certain to find a sector to pump up.

This time around it's construction, and leading stocks in this sector have surged on the expectation that President-elect Barack Obama will push for more spending on infrastructure as part of an economic stimulus package.

In just the past week alone, shares of construction-management firm Fluor Corp (FLR, Fortune 500). have gained 17% and energy-engineering company Shaw Group (SGR, Fortune 500) has skyrocketed 22%

Some of these stocks began to run up even before the election in the hopes of an Obama victory. Shares of contractor and construction materials maker Granite Construction (GVA) are up nearly 70% in the past month. Engineering firm URS (URS, Fortune 500) has soared 65%.

Investors need to be cautious here.

Yes, it's likely that many of these firms would receive some financial lift from increased spending on highways and other projects.

Talkback: Will increased spending on infrastructure help the economy?

But any new business from a stimulus package might not be enough to offset lost business stemming from a weak economy.

"There has been a focus on who will benefit from infrastructure stimulus. While these companies will get work from it, I don't know how significant the benefit will be," said Chase Jacobson, an analyst with Sterne Agee. "I do think that the runup here is a little overdone. Next year for these companies might be okay, but there's a huge question mark around 2010."

Jacobson said that while investors are focusing on the potential increase in public-works projects, many construction firms rely more on other areas of the economy, such as the energy sector.

Jacobs Engineering (JEC, Fortune 500), for example, is a company he follows that may get some new business as a result of more infrastructure spending. But it would not move the dial on the company's sales or profits all that much, he thinks

"To do work on a highway or build a small bridge - that amount is nothing in comparison to building a refinery," he said.

Matt Kaufler, co-portfolio manager of the Touchstone Value Opportunities fund, agreed that investors should not rush into infrastructure stocks just because of the hope of increased stimulus spending.

Kaufler said his fund owns shares of Shaw Group but not because he expects a short-term stimulus pop. Instead, he's holding the stock for the long-haul because he believes Shaw is the best company to benefit from a global buildout of power-generating infrastructure.

So like with any industry, investors should do their homework and not blindly buy a stock just because it's perceived to be in a hot sector. With any group, there will always be losers as well as winners. A big call on an entire sector is a risky move.

Anyway, happy Thanksgiving to all. I hope that none of you are going to stuff yourself with a Turgooduccochiqua. Yuck! 


Construction spending falls
Obama to inherit red ink
China to launch $586B stimulus plan
Credit trickle slows construction

Wednesday, November 26, 2008

Stimulus: The stuff Obama would build

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- America may soon get a whole lot of new stuff.

As part of a new, massive spending plan designed to jumpstart the economy, there's talk of spending hundreds of billions of dollars on new roads, bridges, trains, schools, power plants, transmission lines and energy-efficient homes.

Details on the plan are few. Numbers tossed around range anywhere from $300 billion to $700 billion, and include other measures aimed at stimulating the economy such as tax cuts and money for businesses.

On Monday, President-elect Barack Obama said the measures would be "creating and saving 2.5 million jobs - jobs rebuilding our crumbling roads and bridges, modernizing our schools, and creating the clean energy infrastructure of the twenty-first century."

While the "saving" part of Obama's jobs pledge leaves plenty of wiggle room - it's nearly impossible to say how many jobs would be lost if the stimulus isn't enacted - experts say the next president is generally on target.

"It sounds big, but this is not an unrealistic number he's throwing out there," said Jim Glassman, a senior economist at J.P. Morgan, noting that an economy not in recession generates 1.5 million to 2 million jobs a year anyway.

Although Glassman thinks the tax cut portion of the plan will generate the most jobs, plenty of others have high hopes for the infrastructure part.

Planes, trains and automobiles

On the transportation side, last year's disaster in Minnesota is a stark reminder of what needs to be done on the nation's highways.

"Repaving the roads and strengthening the bridges are very important things to do," said Martin Wachs, director of transportation, space and technology at the Rand Corp., a research outfit. "It's like addressing a backlog of needs."

The backlog is certainly there. Some 3,000 projects, estimated to cost over $18 billion and supporting over half a million jobs, could be under contract in less than 90 days, according to the American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials. The federal government would merely have to release money to the states and these things could be up and running.

Longer term, some argue that creating transportation corridors that bundle together highways, high-speed rail links, pipelines, utility lines and other infrastructure projects would prime the economic pump - not only by creating the jobs during construction, but by speeding up commerce afterwards.

"If you're going to spend money, I can't think of anything better to spend it on," said John Cogan, Houston-based head of global energy and infrastructure projects at the law firm McDermott, Will & Emery. "It would make this economy and enormous engine you couldn't stop."

This opinion is not unanimous. Ever since the Great Depression, economists have debated what makes a better stimulus during recession - government spending or tax cuts and rebates.

It's not that the country doesn't need more roads and schools. It's just that these projects take too long to get up and running to create jobs in the short term.

Moreover, they tend to last several years, so if the economy does bounce back in short order they can become inflationary - tying up money and labor.

"It's a sledgehammer, not a scalpel," said Martin Regalia, chief economist at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, a business lobby group. "There's just one thing that works for the economy, and that's cash in the hands of consumers."

Green power

The other major part of the infrastructure plan is energy, and it's something Obama has been touting since early in his presidential campaign.

He has long called for an an alternative energy project similar to the Apollo Project that put a man on the moon. During the campaign, he pledged to spend $150 billion over 10 years on renewable energy, originally paid for by a tax on carbon dioxide. Al Gore has called for far more - $400 billion over 10 years on the electricity grid alone.

Although the Obama team couldn't be reached for comment, it now seems his energy plan may become a central part of a stimulus package. It may be run out of existing agencies such as the Department of Energy, or it could fall under a new "climate and energy tsar" that Obama is reportedly considering.

To generate the jobs quickly - Obama's 2.5 million pledge is supposed to happen in two years - experts say the government will need to focus on energy efficiency.

This includes things like wrapping water heaters in insulation, caulking or replacing windows, and switching to more efficient appliances.

"There's an army of unemployed construction people, and it could be done quickly," said George Sterzinger, head of the Renewable Energy Policy Project, an advocacy group.

Long term, Sterzinger said the government needs to establish both stable tax credit policies for people who buy renewable power, as well as provide incentives to encourage domestic manufacturers to retool and employ Americans making cutting edge solar, wind and other renewable energy products.

America, he said, used to lead in designing and building renewable energy systems, but has since lost that manufacturing edge - not to countries with cheap labor costs such as China, but to places such as Germany and Denmark where the government supports these industries.

"There is such a focus on projects that you miss the discussion on the best way to develop the industry," he said. "We can still get back in that game."

Transmission lines also need improving. While some argue that entire new lines need to be built, it's possible to create jobs and efficiency simply by upgrading what's already there, said Edward Guinness, co-manager of the Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund.

Installing wires capable of carrying more power and alleviating bottlenecks in several areas of the country are things that can be done now, said Guinness.

'It's a bit like road building, and it's quite labor intensive," he said.

Analysts were reluctant to say how many jobs a massive government push into alternative energy might yield, but did say renewables could go a long way in meeting Obama's 2.5 million goal.

"The amount of capital that would be deployed could create those jobs," said Bruce Kahn, a senior analyst Deutsche Bank's climate change research division. 'It can happen within two years. It is a short-term thing."  


Bailout probably will put upward pressure on rates
Obama outlines plan to create 2.5M jobs

Mortgage rates plummet

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Mortgage rates fell sharply yesterday after the administration announced that it will pump another $800 billion into credit markets to free up frozen consumer and mortgage lending.

That number dwarfed previous government actions aimed at bolstering the mortgage lending market.

"The feds agreed to spend a half a trillion dollars to buy up mortgage backed securities and another $100 billion to fund lending for Fannie and Freddie; we're not talking chump change anymore," said Keith Gumbinger of HSH Associates, a publisher of mortgage information.

Rates averaged 5.77% for the day on a 30-year, fixed rate loan, down from 6.06% Monday, according to Gumbinger. They fell as far as 0.75 percentage points during the day, according to Orawin Velz, Associate Vice President for Economic Forecasting at the Mortgage Bankers Association.

That could save a typical homebuyer more than $90 a month on a $200,000 mortgage.

"The government action was geared to bringing mortgage rates down," said Velz, "and it did."

The drop was the largest since early September, when the administration announced that it was taking control of mortgage giants Fannie Mae (FNM, Fortune 500) and Freddie Mac (FRE, Fortune 500), and stemmed from similar market sentiment.

Both actions sought to give confidence to the investment community. Most mortgages are sold to investors in so-called secondary markets but with foreclosure rates so high and expensive write downs of mortgage-backed securities so common over the past several months, investors had fled the mortgage market.

Instead of buying mortgage bonds, they've been snapping up Treasurys, a virtually risk-free investment. That showed up in the falling yields of Treasury bonds and the greater difference between Treasury yields and mortgage interest rates.

Normally, interest rates on 30-year fixed rate mortgages are only slightly higher than yields on 10-year Treasury bonds, about 1.5 percentage points. That difference compensates mortgage investors for taking on extra risk.

Lately, however, because investors have perceived, quite reasonably, that risks of mortgage-backed securities were far greater than previously supposed, they demanded greater reward for investing in them.

That sent the difference, or spread, between mortgage interest rates and Treasury yields to 2 percentage points or so over the past year. That had widened even more recently, to about 3 percentage points, before the government took action yesterday. Even after the big drop in rates, the spread is still more than 2.5 points.

Whether the government action will lead to lower mortgage rates over the long term remains to be seen. "In theory, it should stimulate investor demand but there are a lot of unforeseen things that can occur," said Velz.

She initially thought the Fannie-Freddie takeover would have much the same long-term impact because it meant that the government was guaranteeing all the loans the two were backing.

"But the government started backstopping almost everything," she said, "so demand for mortgages declined and the spread increased again."

This time might be different, according to Mike Larson, a real estate analyst with Weiss Research, but he's far from certain.

"There's been some short-term bang for the buck," he said. "We have to see if it sticks."

Helping it stick could be the downward pressure from deflation concerns and the still unusually wide spread with Treasurys.

"Even if the spread just got a little tighter you'd get some added horsepower," said Larson. "We could see rates in the low fives pretty soon." 


Q&A: Interest rate cuts won’t have immediate impact
Bailout probably will put upward pressure on rates
Housing plunge: The Fannie fix
Bernanke discusses future of Fannie and Freddie

A squeeze on Thanksgiving dinner

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Ever since losing her executive secretary job last year, Carrie Seal-Stahl of Flat Rock, Mich. has grown produce on a suburban lot to supplement her family's food budget.

That's how she plans to help her mother prepare a Thanksgiving feast for 10 people, including her husband and 10-year-old daughter: with home-grown food.

"I still have some of my produce in the freezer," said Seal-Stahl. "It's a lot less effort to grow your own food than people think it is. I would encourage people to do that, if they are concerned about food prices."

Americans like Seal-Stahl are looking at a lean Thanksgiving this year, as rising food prices and higher unemployment are putting more pressure on shrinking budgets.

Food inflation

The average price of groceries has climbed 7.5% from the beginning of 2008, which is nearly double the general rate of inflation, according to the U.S. government's tally on consumer prices. During the same period, the economy shed about 1.2 million jobs.

The price of turkey and other non-chicken poultry has risen almost 4% since the beginning of this year, while the price of side-dish staples has soared: Potatoes are up 31%, flour and prepared flour mixes are up 20%, and canned fruits and vegetables are up 17%.

Jana Nordstrand, a cookbook publicist from Hoboken, N.J., said that she and her boyfriend prepare an annual feast for eight or nine friends. But this year, she can't be quite as generous as she would like.

"Last year, we cooked most of the food ourselves," said Nordstrand, who is planning to herb-roast an 18-pound turkey with apple-and-sausage stuffing and shiitake mushroom gravy. "This year, we're having more people bring food to cut down costs."

Nordstrand said she expects to spend about $200 on the meal this year, compared with $150 in 2007. "We've literally been budgeting for Thanksgiving, knowing that it's going to cost more," she said.

The end of extra

As Americans spend more on food and other necessities, they have less money to donate to organizations that feed the less fortunate - like D.C. Central Kitchen, a non-profit group that prepares and donates meals to hungry people in the nation's capitol.

"What we're seeing is the end of 'extra,'" said Robert Egger, founder of the D.C. Central Kitchen, which is experiencing a decrease in donations and an increased need from hungry people. "I'm not just talking about extra food. We're also seeing the end of extra money."

Egger said the decline of the restaurant industry has been particularly painful to his organization, because restaurants have traditionally served as its most generous food donors. D.C. Central Kitchen has been purchasing more of its food to prepare the meals, even as prices have increased, he said.

For this Thanksgiving, Egger expects his organization's cost-per-meal to surge to $1.03, up from 65 cents last year. The ingredients and serving-sizes remain the same, he said.

Carrie Seal-Stahl said that unemployment is "kind of a downer," but she still feels grateful. "Compared to some of the things going on in Darfur and Iraq and other places, we really should be thankful for some of the things we do have," she said. 


Gas prices sink below $2
Black Friday retailers hopeful
Below-$3 gas is welcome in Nashville

Tuesday, November 25, 2008

The education of Timothy Geithner

NEW YORK (Fortune) -- When the Dow rocketed 494 points last Friday, it was easy to point to the man responsible. It was the brainy New York Federal Reserve chief, Timothy Geithner.

Why would Wall Street react so positively to the news that the president-elect had nominated for Treasury Secretary a boyish 47-year-old who has neither commercial banking experience nor a Ph.D. in economics? At least in part because of the unconventional way he has prepared himself. Geithner is a self-taught expert in the arcana of global finance who shows a great aptitude for learning and experimenting on the job. At a time when there are no obvious answers, he asks the right questions.

The government has been criticized by some as erratic in its approach to the bailouts. Indeed, Geithner been infinitely flexible in responding to individual situations, allowing Lehman Brothers to fail after playing an instrumental role in bailing out Bear Stearns - a risk that could easily be construed as inconsistency.

After all, the advantages of a one-size-fits-all policy are obvious: It sets expectations for the Street and reduces uncertainty about probable solutions in lookalike meltdowns. But as Geithner knows, one-size-fits-all policies fail to address the intricacies of each situation, especially when each institution's risk profile varies and available resources differ from bank to bank. What's good for taxpayers in the case of Bear may not be what's good for taxpayers in regard to Lehman. (Or Merrill Lynch (MER, Fortune 500). Or Morgan Stanley (MS, Fortune 500). Or Goldman Sachs (GS, Fortune 500). Or AIG (AIG, Fortune 500).)

And Geithner isn't one to ignore these nuances. He's thoughtful and naturally diplomatic, though sometimes has trouble hiding his impatience when his audience, notably Congress, doesn't understand or willfully ignores the specifics. He tends to provide people with details he thinks they need regardless of whether they ask for them. His intensity, somewhat leavened by a deadpan wit, is readily apparent as he explains his analysis of what's happening - sometimes over and over again - until he's absolutely sure that it's sinking in.

He's confident, and it's a confidence that comes from hands-on experience and a history of having to assimilate new things in tough situations that are unprecedented. The Asian financial crisis was perhaps a test run for Geithner - an unwitting opportunity to learn for a natural autodidact who couldn't have possibly missed the potential implications for U.S. markets.

Part of Geithner's ability to deal with policy issues for which his background doesn't necessarily prepare him is a function of his willingness to reach out to the right people for help. During his tenure as the head of the New York Fed, he met frequently with top-level Wall Street executives, routinely taking the temperature of an industry that was slowly reaching the boiling point. There was some criticism at the time that Geithner's perpetual listening tour might have lead him to be unduly influenced by the people he was regulating, but proximity is important. You can't tell what's happening on the Street without talking to people on the street.

Geithner rightly understood that smart regulation is often the product of smart monitoring, a function that has historically been the more formal domain of other regulatory bodies and not the Fed's strong suit. Under Geithner, this usually meant small, entrepreneurial steps toward creating information conduits that would provide the Fed with a better picture of what was happening in real time and create more transparency via better-tailored reporting requirements.

Geithner has precisely what we need in an age where total globalization is no longer an impending threat (or opportunity), but an everyday reality: hard policy experience. He has a previous tour at Treasury under Robert Rubin, who was his mentor, and unlike many of his predecessors he also has foreign-policy experience, with stints at the IMF and the Council on Foreign Relations. He has lived abroad, studied Chinese and Japanese. (Coincidentally, he and Hank Paulson are both Dartmouth graduates.) And if Paulson's well-publicized pre-crisis trips to China are indicative of anything, it's that the Treasury's role extends well beyond Wall Street and the department fully anticipates that many future key developments will happen abroad.

And finally, Geithner has been hands-on through every step of the financial crisis. After all, it happened in his backyard and he was one of the first to respond when it was clear that CDOs were wreaking havoc on bulge-bracket balance sheets. He was aggressive, making the New York Fed more powerful and influential than it's been in years, and not afraid to try new things.

But Geithner wasn't a traditional choice for Fed, and sometimes it's easier to take smart risks when you're a bit of an outsider. Just ask Geithner's new boss. 


Obama Treasury pick means small-dose change
New president, same problems
Markets are battered again

Black Friday retailers hopeful

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Black Friday shopping is expected to decline slightly, but pent-up demand and lower gas prices may provide a small silver lining for the suffering retail industry, according to a survey released Tuesday.

Up to 128 million people said they will shop on the Friday, Saturday, or Sunday after Thanksgiving, down from 135 million the previous year, according to a survey by National Retail Federation (NRF).

But with some consumers holding out for the best deals and a sharp drop in gas prices giving some consumers a little bit of extra cash, retailers are hopeful.

In fact, a full 49 million people said they would "definitely" head to stores, while 79 million said they would decide after seeing the weekend deals.

Despite the decline, NRF called the number a "welcome surprise" after months of suffering retail sales.

"Retailers realize that low prices will get consumers into stores this holiday season, and this could be the most heavily promoted Black Friday in history," said NRF Chief Executive Tracy Mullin, in a statement.

NRF said it will release the results of its Black Friday weekend survey by 4:00 p.m. ET on Sunday, Nov. 30. 


Blame the yen for Wii, LCD prices
Retailers’ holiday deals begin early
Retail sales suffer record drop

Fed bets $800 billion on consumers

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- The Federal Reserve and Treasury Department on Tuesday unveiled a plan to pump $800 billion into the struggling U.S. economy in an attempt to jumpstart lending by banks to consumers and small businesses.

The government hopes that these initiatives will enable more money to flow to consumers in the form of loans than has occurred so far in previous bailout plans.

One program will make $200 billion available from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to holders of securities backed by consumer debt, such as credit cards, car loans and student loans.

The Treasury Department will allocate $20 billion to back that lending in order to cover any losses that the New York Fed might suffer.

In addition, the Federal Reserve, announced it will purchase up to $500 billion in mortgage backed securities that have been backed by Fannie Mae (FNM, Fortune 500), Freddie Mac (FRE, Fortune 500) and Ginnie Mae, the three government-sponsored mortgage finance firms set up to promote home ownership. It will also buy another $100 billion in direct debt issued by those firms.

Together, the programs from the Federal Reserve and the New York Fed are more than Congress approved in October for a bailout of the nation's banks and Wall Street firms. The Fed said the money will come from an increase in its reserves -- in essence, it is creating new money.

The idea is that by making money available for investors who are interested in buying loans bundled together into securities, it will be easier and more profitable for banks to loan money to consumers and small businesses.

Before the current credit crisis, lenders got the money they needed to extend credit by selling the loans they had already made. But the Treasury Department said the issuance of those securities essentially came to a halt in October.

"This lack of affordable consumer credit undermines consumer spending and, as a result, weakens our economy," said Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson at a press conference.

Still, previous efforts to pump money directly into financial institutions have done relatively little to expand credit available for consumers, and some economists said it was not immediately clear if this money would flow through to households as planned.

"It's certainly not directly going to go through to the consumers. I don't know if anyone can say how much will get through," said Keith Hembre, chief economist at First American Funds. "It certainly shouldn't hurt. We'll have to see how much it does help."

To that end, government officials said that they would not set up the $200 billion consumer lending program until February. So officials couldn't say if the mere announcement of the program would cause lenders to make more credit available to consumers in time for the holiday shopping season.

Paulson described the $200 billion consumer lending program as a first step, one that could be expanded later to include different kinds of debt, including assets backed by commercial real estate mortgages and business debt.

He said the fact that the Fed and Treasury had to work together to get an additional $800 billion into the system is not a sign that the $700 billion bailout of banks and Wall Street firms passed by Congress last month has been a failure. He said that, without that program, it is likely that the financial markets would be in even worse shape than they are today.

"I wish, and I know everybody wishes, that one piece of legislation, and then magically the credit markets would unfreeze," he said. "That's not the type of situation we're dealing with."

The fact that the New York Fed is taking the lead on the consumer lending program means that the man nominated by President-elect Obama to succeed Paulson, New York Fed President Timothy Geithner, played a central role in this new effort.

But Paulson said this is not a sign that the Bush administration is letting the new administration call the shots on further efforts to revive the economy.

How it may affect mortgages

The larger part of the new program is geared toward ending the mortgage crisis, which was the original intent of the bank bailout plan proposed in September and signed into law in October.

That plan, known as the Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP, was quickly dropped for one in which Treasury instead made direct capital investments in banks in return for the government receiving preferred shares in the institutions getting funds.

This new program is much closer to the planned bailout. But government officials stressed that this new plan is different from TARP in that only mortgage securities backed by Fannie, Freddie and Ginnie Mae will be in the new program.

The loans being backed by the new program, for the most part, are of better quality than many of the troubled assets that would have been purchased under the original TARP plan.

"This action is being taken to reduce the cost and increase the availability of credit for the purchase of houses, which in turn should support housing markets and foster improved conditions in financial markets more generally," the Fed said in a statement.

There is also limited additional risk for the federal government from the Fed buying that $600 billion in debt from the three firms, since the government is already on the hook for losses those firms suffer on the loans they back.

Despite that implicit government guarantee behind Fannie and Freddie's debt, there gap between rates for U.S. Treasurys and the rates for mortgage assets continues to widen.

But with the Fed buying such a large amount of mortgage assets directly, the hope is that this will narrow that gap and drive down mortgage rates.

The Treasury, which oversees the $700 billion in the TARP program, has been reluctant to expand the use of those funds beyond direct capital investments in banks, despite request to use the funds to help out insurance companies and even the nation's automakers.

The moves came as the Commerce Department announced that gross domestic product, the broadest measure of economic activity, fell at an annual rate of 0.5% in the third quarter.

That was the biggest drop in seven years and economists believe that the economy will decline further in the current quarter and into early next year.

-- with assistance from CNNMoney.com contributing writer Grace Wong in London. 


Bank bailout: Everything you need to know
Q&A: Interest rate cuts won’t have immediate impact
Year of the bailout - and now GM?
Bailout probably will put upward pressure on rates

Monday, November 24, 2008

Obama picks Summers as top economic adviser

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- President-elect Barack Obama is expected to nominate Harvard economist Lawrence Summers as head of the National Economic Council, making him Obama's top economic adviser in the White House, two sources close to the transition told CNN.

Summers had been in the running to be named Treasury Secretary, a post now expected to go to Timothy Geithner, president of the New York Federal Reserve.

Summers, who turns 54 at the end of November, is considered one of the country's preeminent economists, and served as Treasury Secretary for two years during the Clinton administration.

Summers will likely play an important role in crafting the administration's stimulus plan, the early framework of which was unveiled on Saturday by Obama.

The goal is to create 2.5 million jobs by 2011, provided by investments in the nation's roads, bridges, schools and alternative-energy infrastructure.

Summers' economic views are typically characterized as centrist, although he has - like even those in the Bush administration - supported action to the left of center when it comes to trying to resolve the financial crisis.

In a recent column for the Financial Times, Summers acknowledged the need for a greater role for government to weather the economic storm, but stressed the need to make sure government finances are on "sound footing" for the long term.

At a Wall Street Journal conference on Nov. 17, Summers said he believes the economy requires stimulus measures that are "speedy, substantial and sustained over a several-year interval." He said estimates for how much stimulus is needed in aggregate went as high as the $500 billion to $700 billion range.

After leaving the Treasury in 2001, Summers went on to become president of Harvard University for five years.

Earlier in his career, Summers was chief economist at the World Bank and taught at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where he went to college, and at Harvard, where he got his Ph.D. and was one of the youngest faculty members to be awarded tenure. He also served on President Reagan's Council of Economic Advisers.

Today, Summers is the Charles W. Eliot University Professor at Harvard. He also is a part-time managing director at the global investment firm D.E. Shaw & Co. and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

Summers' critics contend he played a role in the current financial crisis. They cite, among other things, his support for the Commodity Futures Modernization Act, which allowed many derivatives - like the credit default swaps that have rocked markets this fall - to go unregulated.

"The policies he promoted as Treasury Secretary and in his subsequent writings led to the economic disaster that we now face," wrote economist Dean Baker, a director of the liberal Center for Economic and Policy Research.

- CNN's Ed Henry contributed to this report 


Obama Treasury pick means small-dose change
Obama to inherit red ink

Holiday spending slashed - survey

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Consumer spending is expected to decline sharply during the 2008 holidays due to constrained budgets and financial anxiety about the future, according to a survey released Monday.

A little more than half, or 55%, of the 1,000 respondents said they planned to reduce holiday spending at least "somewhat," and a full 27% said they planned to spend "much less than last year," according to the Consumer Federation of America (CFA) and the Credit Union National Association (CUNA) survey.

The top two reasons cited by those planning to spend less were the economy and related economic uncertainty (36%), and less money (22%).

"The results are so sharply different from the past eight years we have been doing this survey," said CUNA chief economist Bill Hampel. "Since data collecting began in 1992, we haven't seen a year-over-year decline."

From 2003 to 2007, the survey showed just 30% to 35% of consumers cutting back on holiday spending.

"This year, I'd guess spending could be 2% to 5% less than last year," said Hampel.

Record numbers of all age and income groups intend to reduce spending in 2008, according to the survey. Sixty-two percent of women and 61% of households with children said they would tighten the purse strings, compared with only 48% of men and 51% of childless households.

The survey of 1,000 adult Americans was conducted Nov. 6-9, with a margin of error of plus/minus three percentage points.  


Retail Sales
Retailers’ holiday deals begin early
Americans rein in online spending
Office parties get downsized

Bank bailout: Everything you need to know

(Money Magazine) -- On Oct. 14, the U.S. Treasury announced it would spend $250 billion of taxpayer money to buy shares in U.S. banks. The feds hope that the infusion will resolve the financial crisis paralyzing the economy. Here, in 300 words or less, is everything you need to know about it.

Why not the original $700 billion bailout plan? Because Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson's first idea - buying $700 billion of suspect loans that banks couldn't unload - didn't ease fears. The week after that plan became law, the S&P 500 dropped 18%. Investors were concerned that unless the Treasury wildly overpaid for the loans, it wouldn't save the banks, says University of Chicago economist Douglas Diamond.

Why do the feds think the cash infusion will work? Simple math. Because banks can make more than $10 worth of loans for every dollar of equity, a cash infusion makes a bigger splash than using that same money to lop off bad debt. Plus, the tactic has succeeded elsewhere: When banks tanked in Sweden in the early 1990s, the government bought up stock as part of an ultimately successful bailout.

What will be the final price for taxpayers? Unclear. "Before we can figure out what it's going to cost to do the surgery, we've got to stabilize the patient," says Frank W. Anderson, a longtime banking analyst who now teaches at the University of Texas at Dallas. The government hopes that the banks will repurchase the shares within five years, but since it will need to borrow to get the money for the investment, the national debt will rise. Still, letting lending freeze and bank failures run amok would likely be much costlier in the long run.

How will I know if the cash infusion is working? Look for a loosening of credit as seen in a decrease in the TED spread, a measure of the banks' trust in one another. A week after this plan was announced, the spread had fallen.  


Paulson defends changes in bailout strategy
How to build a better bailout
White House tells banks to stop hoarding, start lending

Sunday, November 23, 2008

Cheap gas can't save the economy

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- The stock market stinks like a moldy piece of Limburger cheese. Unemployment is on the rise. Home prices continue to fall. There are fears that one or more of Detroit's Big Three could go bankrupt.

There is, however, one bit of good economic news: The average price of gasoline is now less than $2 a gallon for the first time since March 2005, down 52% from the peak of $4.11 in July.

That - in theory - means more money for people to spend and get the economy going. Mark Zandi, chief economist for Moody's Economy.com, says that if gas prices stay around $2 a gallon throughout 2009, that would save consumers about $100 billion compared to this year.

But don't get too excited: There may be less pain at the pump - but there's pain just about everywhere else.

"Every penny helps and the savings are significant," said Zandi. "But the negatives so far outweigh the positives that the economy will have a tough time in 2009," Zandi said.

Talkback: Has cheaper gas changed your spending habits?

The two biggest problems, according to Sean Snaith, director of the Institute for Economic Competitiveness at the University of Central Florida in Orlando, are the stock market turmoil and housing meltdown.

"Is this a panacea for consumers? No, It's like putting an analgesic on a deep wound," Snaith said. "Trillions of dollars in stock market wealth and home values are gone. Saving a few bucks at the pump can't compensate for that."

Snaith added that he believes many consumers are skeptical as to whether lower prices will really stick. So he doesn't think consumers will rush to start spending.

"People are skeptical. We're not going to run out and all go buy Hummers again. The memory of $4 gas will linger," he said.

This is playing out in the form of dismal forecasts for the holiday shopping season. According to a survey of consumers by the Conference Board released Friday, Americans are expected to spend an average of $418 on Christmas gifts, down 11% from estimates from the same time a year ago.

"This is shaping up to be one of the most challenging holiday seasons in years and it's going to take more than the usual discounts and incentives from retailers to get consumers to spend more freely," said Lynn Franco, director of The Conference Board Consumer Research Center in a release.

Still, shouldn't lower gas prices have some impact? After all, before the credit crisis took center stage in September, it seemed that the only financial news that mattered was the ever-rising price of gas.

Some experts speculated earlier this summer that the average price of gas would hit $5 a gallon or even higher by the end of the year. That's clearly not going to happen. So at least one financial expert believes that cheaper gas prices will lead to a brighter holiday shopping season than most expect.

"As consumers become more comfortable with extended lower prices for fuel -- look for increased discretionary spending in other areas. Falling energy prices should improve the prospects for better than currently anticipated holiday spending by consumers," wrote Bill Knapp, investment strategist for MainStay Investments, in a note to clients Thursday.

I'd love to think Knapp is right. And I, as many of my loyal readers are happy to point out, tend to do my best Monty Python and always look on the bright side of life. But even I can't share this sense of hope.

While $2 gas is obviously better than $4 gas, it's not enough to kick start consumer spending. And heck, that's probably a good thing (yeah yeah, there I go being optimistic again). After all, if this financial crisis has taught us anything, it should be that binging on credit is a very very bad thing.

So if consumers take some of the cash they now have from lower prices at the gas station and using it to save, invest and pay down debt, that would be encouraging news indeed.  


Gas prices fall below $3
Gas falls to $2.45 a gallon
Below-$3 gas is welcome in Nashville
Cheaper gas won’t end Americans’ new thrifty driving habits

Job cuts cast dark cloud

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- As the economic outlook worsens, job cut announcements have come in hard and fast this week from businesses across the nation.

Citigroup (C, Fortune 500) announced Monday it will cut more than 50,000 jobs - one of the largest announced payroll scale backs in history. Boeing (B) said Tuesday it will cut upwards of 800 jobs, Bank of New York Mellon (BK, Fortune 500) plans on cutting 1,800 jobs and Washington Mutual added 1600 jobs to the toll on Thursday.

In all, employers have announced in excess of 110,000 job cuts thus far in November - over 60,000 of which were announced this week alone. Though many of the job cuts represent global figures or won't take place until next year, the ever-worsening job scene is an ominous sign before this month's payroll figures are announced in two weeks.

"The pace of deterioration in the labor market is accelerating," said Sam Bullard, economist at Wachovia, who predicted the economy could lose upwards of 350,000 jobs this month.

The economy has shed more than 1 million jobs so far this year, according to the Department of Labor, and first-time filings for unemployment insurance increased 542,000 in the past week - the highest since July 1992. The numerous reports of corporate job slashing in November are a sign that the labor market won't start to recover any time soon.

Unemployment forecasts have risen as the economic outlook for 2009 continues to worsen.

The Federal Reserve Tuesday said it predicts the unemployment rate will remain around 6.5% for the remainder of 2008, and will rise up to 7.6% in 2009. But that's a far cry from the jobless rate forecast of 9% for next year with further increases in 2010 that Goldman Sachs released Friday.

Goldman said it expects the U.S. economy to shrink 5% this quarter with more gross domestic product declines in the first half of of next year. An economy in a recession will lead to "unequivocally the worst single downturn on record since World War II insofar as increases in joblessness are concerned," the forecast said.

"It's hard to have a lot of optimism about the job market, because there are so many headwinds facing the economy," Bullard said. "This is definitely the deepest consumer retrenchment since the mid-1970s."

Accordingly, more job cut announcements are likely on the way. U.S. automakers say they are on the verge of collapse, retailers are expected to have a miserable holiday season and financial institutions continue to struggle in the midst of a credit crisis.

But even if the economy begins to improve in the second half of 2009 as some economists predict, unemployment could still continue to rise. Typically job losses continue for many months after the economy begins to pull out of a recession, with unemployment rates peaking as much as a year after the recession hits its trough.

In an attempt to heal the ailing job market, President-elect Barack Obama has repeatedly stated his support for another economic stimulus package in the form of tax rebates to consumers, states and municipalities. The proposal has gained traction in Congress, with hopes that consumer spending and aid to governments will help boost the economy.

But Obama won't take office until January, and signed legislation could be a long way off. In the meantime, experts say the labor market will continue to struggle. 


Job losses accelerate, and worst may lie ahead
Jobless claims higher than expected
Layoffs hit every corner

Obama Treasury pick means small-dose change

NEW YORK (Fortune) -- What does the likely choice of New York Federal Reserve chief Timothy Geithner as his Treasury Secretary say about our President-elect? Simple: He believes in change, just not too much of it.

Geithner's selection emphasizes continuity and experience, the benefits you'd get from keeping Hank Paulson in the job, but is more appealing because the 47-year-old central banker gives the appearance of a fresh face arriving in Washington. Yet he is a Washington veteran whose fingerprints are all over the federal government's attempts to rescue ailing financial markets.

The harsh economic lesson facing President-elect Obama is that markets don't like change. Since his Nov. 4 victory, the Dow Jones average has gyrated wildly, ending 2,073 points lower as of Thursday, Nov. 21. Of course, the Dow's stomach-churning fall below the 8,000 mark this past week can be attributed to frightening economic realities ranging from the stubborn persistence of a global credit crunch to the shaky conditions of name-brand financial firms and automakers.

But uncertainty about the incoming administration also played a role. That much became clear Friday, when the Dow surged nearly 500 points, ending at 8,046, after news of the Geithner choice emerged. Obama is reportedly planning to unveil his entire economic team next week, as early as Monday, in order to further calm markets.

Meanwhile, the President-elect is already taking ownership of the troubled economy he will inherit. In his weekly radio address, Obama acknowledged that the economy is "likely to get worse before it gets better."

"We now risk falling into a deflationary spiral that could increase our massive debt even further," President-elect Obama said.

Noting that "we've lost 1.2 million jobs this year" and could lose millions more before the crisis is over, Obama said he has directed his economic team to design a massive federal jobs plan, employing 2.5 million Americans by 2011 to rebuild roads, bridges and schools and to construct alternative-energy projects including wind farms and solar-power installations.

Among the candidates Obama considered for Treasury Secretary, Geithner was the least well known to him. Former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers, who is now expected to be tapped for a top White House job, was part of Obama's inner circle of economic advisers during the general election campaign.

But Geithner and his likely new boss have much in common, starting with age: They were born just 14 days apart. Both men have lived overseas: Obama as a young boy in Indonesia; Geithner as the son of a U.S. AID official who spent part of his childhood in India and Thailand. And Geithner, despite his even temperament and serious demeanor, has a wicked sense of humor that would appeal to the President-elect.

Geithner, moreover, brings the kind of nonpartisan, pragmatic-minded approach to the job that Obama has insisted he values on his economic team. Geithner, who has a master's in international economics from Johns Hopkins' School of Advanced International Studies, does not have a doctorate in economics or experience as a private sector banker. But he is a quick study and notably circumspect about how one part of the economy affects another. During his career he has sought counsel from a range of experts that cross the political divide, from Republicans like Henry Kissinger (his first boss), Alan Greenspan and John Thain to Democrats like Robert Rubin and Summers, his successive bosses as Under Secretary of the Treasury for International Affairs during the Clinton administration.

In his radio address, President-elect Obama said that Jan. 21, his first day in office, would bring a "new direction, new ideas and new reforms" -- and certainly an FDR-style federal jobs program would mark a big change from Bush administration's approach to the economic crisis.

But it's not clear Obama will bring much change to the Treasury's $700 billion rescue effort that has members of Congress growing increasingly impatient. It was Geithner who engineered J.P. Morgan's buyout of troubled Bear Stearns with a $29 billion loan from his New York Federal Reserve bank -- the first of the government's serial interventions in the markets -- and he has remained a key figure in efforts that followed.

Wall Street may applaud the Geithner appointment but there are members of Congress who will make his nomination hearing a grueling experience, largely out of frustration that the Treasury Department's ever-changing rescue attempts still haven't unplugged the credit crunch.

But this is nothing Geithner hasn't faced before. Last spring, it was Geithner who took on the heavy lifting during a Senate Banking Committee interrogation that also featured Fed chairman Ben Bernanke and SEC Chairman Christopher Cox. Geithner repeated, over and over and with much detail, his case that the Bear Stearns deal was made with taxpayer interests in mind, and with the intention of avoiding the "moral hazard" of a bailout that would reward dangerous risk-taking.

And, in a moment that showed that this longtime Washington hand, who was on the frontlines of dealing with the Asian financial crisis in 1997-98, is not easily intimidated by his inquisitors, Geithner insisted, "Can I just go through a few important things, for the record?" 


Obama to inherit red ink
Obama pushes lame-duck agenda
New president, same problems